From Partnership to Precarity: Economic Justice and Labor Protection in Indonesia’s Platform-Based Transport Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65815/sh3b1845Keywords:
platform economy, labor protection, economic precarity, partnership model, IndonesiaAbstract
Platform-based transport services have expanded rapidly in Indonesia, creating flexible income opportunities while simultaneously generating concerns regarding income instability, unilateral platform governance, and limited labor protection. This study examines the extent to which partnership-based contractual arrangements contribute to economic precarity among platform transport workers. The research adopts an interdisciplinary framework combining labor law, political economy, and economic justice. It analyzes contractual structures, platform governance mechanisms, social protection arrangements, and the allocation of economic risks between drivers and digital platforms. Secondary literature, regulatory documents, and publicly available evidence concerning platform work are examined to identify institutional gaps in worker protection. The study argues that the concept of partnership may produce an asymmetrical relationship when workers remain economically dependent on platforms while lacking the legal protections associated with conventional employment. From an economic justice perspective, flexibility should not be considered sufficient justification for transferring market, operational, and income risks disproportionately to workers. The study proposes that regulatory reform should focus on substantive economic dependence rather than contractual labels alone. Its contribution lies in linking the legal structure of platform work with distributive and procedural dimensions of justice. The analysis provides policy implications for developing a more balanced regulatory framework for Indonesia’s platform-based transport economy.
Downloads
References
De Stefano, Valerio. 2016. "The Rise of the 'Just-in-Time Workforce': On-Demand Work, Crowdwork, and Labour Protection in the 'Gig-Economy'." Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37 (3): 471–504. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2724652.
Ford, Michele, and Vivian Honan. 2019. "The Gig Economy in Indonesia: Making Sense of Platform Work." Lowy Institute Academic Papers. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv18b5c98.
Graham, Mark, and Jamie Woodcock. 2018. "Towards a Fairer Platform Economy: Legal and Ethical Considerations." Competition & Change 22 (2): 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529418758223.
Minister of Transportation. 2019. Regulation of the Minister of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia Number PM 12 of 2019 concerning Safety Protection of Motorcycle Users Used for the Interest of the Community. Jakarta: Ministry of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia.
Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119293149.
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350223172.
Titin, Titin, and Agus Purwanto. 2020. "Legal Protection for Gig Economy Workers in Indonesia: Between Flexibility and Exploitation." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 50 (2): 345–360. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no2.2581.
Wood, Alex J., Mark Graham, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Isis Hjorth. 2019. "Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy." Work, Employment and Society 33 (1): 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Authors retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).








