Taxing Consumption, Protecting Welfare: A Distributional Analysis of Indonesia’s 12 Percent VAT Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65815/4nb2j905Keywords:
value-added tax, consumption taxation, fiscal justice, household welfare, IndonesiaAbstract
Value-added tax is widely regarded as an efficient source of public revenue, but its consumption-based structure raises important questions concerning distributional fairness. This study examines the welfare and distributional implications of Indonesia’s 12 percent value-added tax policy, focusing on whether higher consumption taxation disproportionately affects lower- and middle-income households. The study adopts a distributional policy-analysis framework combining tax policy analysis with household consumption patterns and socioeconomic characteristics. Secondary data on household expenditure, consumption composition, and fiscal policy are used to assess the potential incidence of the VAT burden across income groups. The analysis distinguishes between essential and discretionary consumption to identify differences in effective tax exposure among households. The study further examines whether exemptions, exclusions, or compensatory fiscal measures can mitigate potentially regressive outcomes. Rather than assessing VAT solely in terms of revenue generation, the study evaluates the policy through the broader principles of vertical equity and welfare protection. The analysis suggests that the distributive consequences of VAT depend not only on the statutory rate but also on the composition of household consumption and the design of compensatory policies. The study contributes to the literature by framing VAT reform as an issue of fiscal justice and by highlighting the importance of distribution-sensitive tax design in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Bachas, Pierre, Lucie Gadenne, and Anders Jensen. 2020. “Informality, Consumption Taxes, and Redistribution.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 9267.
Bird, Richard M., and Pierre-Pascal Gendron. 2007. The VAT in Developing and Transitional Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brockmeyer, Anne, Giulia Mascagni, Vedanth Nair, Mazhar Waseem, and Miguel Almunia. 2024. “Does the Value-Added Tax Add Value? Lessons Using Administrative Data from a Diverse Set of Countries.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 38 (1): 107–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.38.1.107.
Caspersen, Erik, and Gilbert Metcalf. 1994. “Is a Value Added Tax Regressive? Annual versus Lifetime Incidence Measures.” National Tax Journal 47 (4): 731–46.
Emran, M. Shahe, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 2007. “Equity and Efficiency in Tax Reform in Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Economics 83 (1): 1–25.
Indonesia. 1983. Law No. 8 of 1983 concerning Value Added Tax on Goods and Services and Sales Tax on Luxury Goods, as amended.
Indonesia. 2021. Law No. 7 of 2021 concerning Harmonization of Tax Regulations.
Indonesia. 2022. Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation, subsequently enacted as Law No. 6 of 2023.
Indonesia. 2024. Minister of Finance Regulation No. 131 of 2024 concerning the Treatment of Value Added Tax on Imports and Supplies of Taxable Goods and Taxable Services.
International Monetary Fund. 2023. “Building Tax Capacity in Developing Countries.” IMF Staff Discussion and Policy Materials.
Jellema, Jon, Ali Wai-Poi, and Maya Afkar. 2017. “The Distributional Impact of Taxes and Government Spending in Indonesia.” In The Distributional Impact of Taxes and Transfers: Evidence from Eight Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Keen, Michael. 2013. “The Anatomy of the VAT.” National Tax Journal 66 (2): 423–46.
Kirchler, Erich, Erik Hoelzl, and Ingrid Wahl. 2008. “Enforced versus Voluntary Tax Compliance: The ‘Slippery Slope’ Framework.” Journal of Economic Psychology 29 (2): 210–25.
OECD. 2018. OECD Economic Surveys: Indonesia 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Qian, Rong, and Grzegorz Poniatowski. 2024. Estimating Value Added Tax (VAT) and Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Gaps in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Slemrod, Joel, and Shlomo Yitzhaki. 2001. “Integrating Expenditure Systems and Tax Systems.” Journal of Public Economics 81 (2): 279–301.
Stiglitz, Joseph E., and M. Shahe Emran. 2007. “Equity and Efficiency in Tax Reform in Developing Countries.” Journal of Development Economics 83 (1): 1–25.
Thomas, Alastair. 2022. “Reassessing the Regressivity of the VAT.” Fiscal Studies 43 (1): 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5890.12290.
Tiwari, Sailesh, Hidayat Amir, Imam Setiawan, Ali Moechtar, Anissa Rahmawati, Francis Addeah Darko, Ralph van Doorn, Juul Pinxten, and Adelia Surya Pratiwi. 2021. Revisiting the Impact of Government Spending and Taxes on Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia. Jakarta: World Bank and Fiscal Policy Agency, Ministry of Finance.
World Bank. 2020. Revisiting the Impact of Government Spending and Taxes on Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2022. Indonesia Economic Prospects: A Green Horizon—Toward High Growth and a Low Carbon Economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2024. Estimating Value Added Tax (VAT) and Corporate Income Tax (CIT) Gaps in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Authors retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).








