Criminal Sentencing and the Protection of Child Victims in Sexual Violence Cases: An Analysis of Bandung District Court Decision No. 989/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bdg
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65815/xe2d3y69Keywords:
child protection, sexual violence, restitution, sentencing, victim-centred justiceAbstract
Sexual violence against children requires a criminal justice response that simultaneously addresses offender accountability, victim protection, and the restoration of victims' rights. The Herry Wirawan case is particularly significant because the victims were children and the court imposed a severe criminal sanction together with restitution-related measures. This study examines Bandung District Court Decision No. 989/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bdg to analyse the relationship between criminal sentencing and the protection of child victims in sexual violence proceedings. The official case record shows that the defendant was convicted of repeatedly committing sexual violence against multiple children and was sentenced to life imprisonment, with restitution imposed in relation to the victims. The study aims to assess whether the court's sentencing approach reflects the principles of child protection, proportionality, victim-centred justice, and rehabilitation. A normative juridical method is employed using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The research analyses child-protection legislation, sexual-violence legislation, sentencing principles, and the judicial reasoning contained in the decision. The study argues that effective protection of child victims cannot be measured solely through the severity of imprisonment. Restitution, procedural protection, psychological recovery, and recognition of victims' long-term harm are equally important dimensions of justice. The case demonstrates the need to integrate punitive and restorative elements within the judicial response to sexual violence against children. The study contributes to the development of a victim-centred framework for sentencing in Indonesian child sexual-abuse cases.
Downloads
References
Ali, Mahrus, and Ari Wibowo. 2018. “Kompensasi dan Restitusi yang Berorientasi pada Korban Tindak Pidana.” Yuridika 33 (2): 260–89. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v33i2.7414.
El Zuhdi, A. Muflih, Teuku M. Sulthanarafif, Dinda Maulia Dini, M. Abid Bagas, and Henny Yuningsih. 2023. “Critical Analysis of Restitution Burden to the State (Study of Herry Wirawan).” Sriwijaya Crimen and Legal Studies 1 (2). https://doi.org/10.28946/scls.v1i2.2701.
Intan, Dewi. 2022. “Perlindungan Hukum Kekerasan Seksual di Sekolah Studi Kasus: Kasus Dugaan Pemerkosaan oleh Herry Wirawan.” Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 4 (3): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v4i3.103.
Madyana, Rida, and Safik Faozi. 2023. “Pemulihan Korban Melalui Restitusi bagi Korban Kekerasan Seksual (Studi Putusan Nomor: 989/PID.SUS/2021/PN BDG).” UNES Law Review 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.863.
Ramadianto, Anang Riyan, Milda Istiqomah, and Nurini Aprilianda. 2025. “Victim Impact Statement as a Model of Victim-Centered Justice in Child Sexual Abuse Cases.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 32 (2). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss2.art4.
Tahulending, Christofel. 2021. “Restitusi bagi Anak yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana.” LEX CRIMEN.
Triono, Agus, and Dadang Herli Saputra. 2024. “Pemenuhan Hak Restitusi Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan (Kasus Herry Wirawan).” Southeast Asian Journal of Victimology 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.51825/sajv.v2i2.25152.
Legal Sources
Indonesia. Law No. 35 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.
Indonesia. Law No. 17 of 2016 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.
Indonesia. Law No. 31 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law No. 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims.
Indonesia. Law No. 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes (Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual).
Indonesia. Government Regulation No. 43 of 2017 concerning the Implementation of Restitution for Children Who Become Victims of Criminal Offences.
Indonesia. Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2022 concerning Procedures for Resolving Applications for and Granting Restitution and Compensation to Victims of Criminal Offences.
Bandung District Court. 2022. Decision No. 989/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Bdg, Herry Wirawan, February 15, 2022.
Bandung High Court. 2022. Decision No. 86/PID.SUS/2022/PT BDG, Herry Wirawan.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. 2022. Decision No. 5642 K/Pid.Sus/2022, Herry Wirawan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Endah Dwi Saputri (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Authors retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).








