Distributive Justice in Teacher Affirmative Policy: A Case Study of Special Allowance Allocation for Teachers in Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65815/3p9p0425Keywords:
distributive justice, teacher policy, affirmative policy, Papua, 3T educationAbstract
Teacher distribution and welfare remain central challenges in achieving equitable educational quality across geographically disadvantaged regions of Indonesia. In 2026, the Indonesian government expanded its affirmative program for teachers working in disadvantaged, frontier, and outermost areas, including an increased allocation of special teacher allowances. This study examines the policy through the framework of distributive justice, focusing on whether affirmative financial support adequately recognizes the structural burdens experienced by teachers in remote regions. Using a qualitative policy case study, the research analyzes policy objectives, eligibility mechanisms, distribution procedures, and perceived effects among teachers and education stakeholders in Papua. The study distinguishes between equality of treatment and equity of compensation, arguing that teachers working under substantially different geographical, infrastructural, and socioeconomic conditions may require differentiated policy support. The analysis also considers whether financial incentives alone are sufficient to address teacher shortages and retention problems. The study proposes that distributive justice in teacher policy should integrate financial compensation with professional development, housing, transportation, digital connectivity, and career advancement opportunities. By examining teacher welfare as a matter of educational justice rather than merely human-resource management, this research contributes to broader discussions about state responsibility and equitable education provision in geographically marginalized regions.
Downloads
References
Bank Indonesia. 2024. Regional Policy Research Paper: Education and Human Capital Development in Indonesia. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.
Beteille, Tara, Kaliope Azzi-Huck, and Raju Jan Singh. 2012. “School Incentives and Teacher Effort: The Case of Teacher Absence in Indonesia.” Journal of Development Studies 48 (10): 1433–49.
Direktorat Guru Pendidikan Dasar. 2025. “PPG bagi Guru Tertentu di Daerah Khusus 2025: Upaya Menghadirkan Kesempatan Setara bagi Guru di Wilayah 3T.” Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Gaduh, Arya, Menno Pradhan, Daniel Suryadarma, Samuel A. Rogers, and Amir H. P. Purnamasari. 2023. “Can Community Participation Leverage Changes in Teacher Behavior? Evidence from Remote Areas of Indonesia.” Journal of Public Economics 219: 104818.
Glewwe, Paul, Nauman Ilias, and Michael Kremer. 2010. “Teacher Incentives.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2 (3): 205–27.
Government of Indonesia. 1945. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Government of Indonesia. 2005. Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 14 of 2005 on Teachers and Lecturers.
Government of Indonesia. 2009. Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia No. 41 of 2009 on Allowances for Teachers and Lecturers, Special Allowances for Teachers and Lecturers, and Honorary Allowances for Professors.
Government of Indonesia. 2014. Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government.
Government of Indonesia. 2025. Regulation of the Minister of Primary and Secondary Education No. 4 of 2025 on Technical Guidelines for the Provision of Professional Allowances, Special Allowances, and Additional Income for Regional Civil Servant Teachers.
Guarino, Cassandra M., Lucrecia Santibañez, and Glenn A. Daley. 2006. “Teacher Recruitment and Retention: A Review of the Recent Empirical Literature.” Review of Educational Research 76 (2): 173–208. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076002173.
Hanushek, Eric A., John F. Kain, and Steven G. Rivkin. 2004. “Why Public Schools Lose Teachers.” Journal of Human Resources 39 (2): 326–54. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.XXXIX.2.326.
Hargreaves, Andy. 2009. A Decade of Educational Change and a Defining Moment of Opportunity: An Introduction. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ingersoll, Richard M. 2001. “Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal 38 (3): 499–534. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003499.
Kraft, Matthew A., and Allison F. Gilmour. 2016. “Can Principals Promote Teacher Development as Evaluators?” Educational Administration Quarterly 52 (5): 711–53.
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Murnane, Richard J., and David K. Cohen. 1986. “Merit Pay and the Evaluation Problem: Why Most Merit Pay Plans Fail and a Few Survive.” Harvard Educational Review 56 (1): 1–17.
OECD and Asian Development Bank. 2015. Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rivkin, Steven G., Eric A. Hanushek, and John F. Kain. 2005. “Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement.” Econometrica 73 (2): 417–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x.
Sen, Amartya. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
SMERU Research Institute. 2010. Study on Teacher Absenteeism in Indonesia. Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.
Toyamah, Nina, et al. 2010. Teacher Absenteeism in Indonesia: A Study of the National and Regional Context. Jakarta: SMERU Research Institute.
World Bank. 2009. Teacher Employment and Deployment in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2012. Investing in Indonesia’s Education: Allocation, Equity and Efficiency of Education Spending. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2013. Spending More or Spending Better: Improving Education Financing in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2020. The Promise of Education in Indonesia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2021. Indonesia Education Sector Review: Main Report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Faqih (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Authors retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).








