Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Policing in Indonesia: Governance, Ethics, and the Future of Law Enforcement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65815/633e4r40Keywords:
artificial intelligence, predictive policing, algorithmic governance, police technology, IndonesiaAbstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly being considered for applications in policing, including crime analysis, risk assessment, pattern recognition, and predictive policing. While these technologies may enhance analytical capabilities, their use also raises concerns regarding bias, transparency, privacy, accountability, and the potential expansion of surveillance. This study examines the prospects and governance challenges associated with artificial intelligence and predictive policing in Indonesia. Using qualitative policy and conceptual analysis, the study evaluates the potential applications of AI in law enforcement while considering relevant ethical and institutional safeguards. The analysis argues that technological effectiveness cannot be separated from questions of legitimacy and governance. AI-supported policing systems may reproduce existing institutional biases when trained on incomplete or historically distorted data, while opaque algorithmic decision-making can make accountability difficult. The study therefore proposes that AI adoption should be accompanied by principles of transparency, human oversight, proportionality, data protection, and independent accountability. The article contributes to emerging scholarship on AI and policing by applying international debates concerning algorithmic governance to the Indonesian context. It concludes that responsible adoption requires institutional readiness and a governance framework that places human rights and public accountability at the centre of technological innovation.
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal or the authors’ affiliated institutions. Authors retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).








