Corruption Risks in Indonesian Local Government Procurement: Evaluating Digital Procurement as an Anti-Corruption Instrument

Authors

  • Beni Aditya Putra Universitas Pasundan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65815/1exfrs04

Keywords:

Public procurement, e-procurement, local government, corruption prevention, Indonesia

Abstract

Public procurement represents a significant area of corruption risk because government contracts involve substantial financial resources and interactions between public officials and private businesses. Indonesia has expanded electronic procurement systems to improve transparency, standardization, and competition. This article examines whether digital procurement mechanisms effectively reduce corruption risks in Indonesian local governments. Using normative juridical and policy analysis, the study evaluates electronic procurement regulations, transparency requirements, procurement processes, conflict-of-interest controls, and monitoring mechanisms. The article argues that digitalization can reduce opportunities for certain forms of manipulation but cannot eliminate corruption when collusion occurs outside the digital platform or when procurement specifications are designed to favor particular suppliers. The study proposes an integrated anti-corruption framework combining digital transparency with beneficial ownership disclosure, conflict-of-interest declarations, procurement analytics, whistleblower protection, and independent monitoring. Particular attention is given to local governments where institutional capacity and oversight quality may vary significantly. The article concludes that electronic procurement should be understood as an enabling technology rather than a complete anti-corruption solution. Effective corruption prevention requires technological systems to be supported by institutional independence, data analysis, and meaningful enforcement.

References

Alfitra, Mara Sutan Rambe, Oksidelfa Yanto, and Ahmad Bahtiar. 2025. “Criminal Acts of Corruption by State Officials in Procurement of Goods and Services: Study of the Role of Justice Collaborators and Whistleblowers in the Age of Technology.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v10i2.8341.

Anggriawan, Rizaldy. 2024. “From Collusion to Corruption: How Indonesian Law Fights Back in Procurement Conspiracy.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v6i1.24577.

Ariani, Dwi Intan, and Dyah Setyaningrum. 2023. “E-Procurement and Corruption Prevention in Indonesia's Local Governments.” International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies 18 (3–4): 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEPEE.2023.136316.

Bauhr, Monika. 2020. “Lights on the Shadows of Public Procurement: Transparency as an Antidote to Corruption.” Governance 33 (3): 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12432.

Dani, Bayu Surya, and Mohamad Dian Revindo. 2025. “Implementation of e-Procurement Policy and Corruption in Public Procurement: The Case of Indonesia.” International Journal of Electronic Governance 17 (2): 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2025.148167.

Dávid-Barrett, Elizabeth, and Mihály Fazekas. 2020. “Grand Corruption and Government Change: An Analysis of Partisan Favoritism in Public Procurement.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 26: 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09416-4.

Davila, Antonio, Abbie Gupta, and Richard J. Palmer. 2003. “Moving Procurement Systems to the Internet: The Adoption and Use of E-Procurement Technology Models.” European Management Journal 21 (1): 11–23.

Decarolis, Francesco, and Cristina Giorgiantonio. 2022. “A Corruption Risk Indicator for Public Procurement.” European Journal of Political Economy 73: 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2021.102141.

Decarolis, Francesco, Cristina Giorgiantonio, and others. 2022. “Corruption Red Flags in Public Procurement: New Evidence from Italian Calls for Tenders.” EPJ Data Science 11: 16. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00325-x.

Fauziah, Atika Yanel, and Jonathan Marpaung. 2024. “Conflict of Interest in Public Procurement: A Case Study of Indonesia's Government Institution XYZ.” JIMEK: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.30737/jimek.v7i1.5638.

Fazekas, Mihály, and Gábor Kocsis. 2020. “Uncovering High-Level Corruption: Cross-National Objective Corruption Risk Indicators Using Public Procurement Data.” British Journal of Political Science 50 (1): 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000461.

Fazekas, Mihály, and István János Tóth. 2016. “From Corruption to State Capture: A New Analytical Framework with Empirical Applications from Hungary.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916639137.

Fazekas, Mihály, Johannes Wachs, and János Kertész. 2020. “Corruption and the Network Structure of Public Contracting Markets across Government Change.” Politics and Governance 8 (2): 195–207.

Fazekas, Mihály, Salvatore Sberna, and Alberto Vannucci. 2022. “The Extra-Legal Governance of Corruption: Tracing the Organization of Corruption in Public Procurement.” Governance 35 (4): 1139–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12648.

Graycar, Adam. 2022. “Corrupt Procurement: Rethinking the Roles of Principals and Agents.” Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy 3 (2): 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2113461.

Haryadi, Anda Dwi, Hilda Rossieta, and Sidharta Utama. 2019. “The Impact of Government Oversight on Corruption in Procurement Activities of Local Governments in Indonesia.” Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Business and Economics Conference. https://doi.org/10.2991/apbec-18.2019.24.

Jiménez, Alfredo, Julien Hanoteau, and Ralf Barkemeyer. 2022. “E-Procurement and Firm Corruption to Secure Public Contracts: The Moderating Role of Governance Institutions and Supranational Support.” Journal of Business Research 149: 640–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.070.

Kölln, Ann-Kristin. 2016. “Does Party Finance Regulation Create a Level Playing Field?” Election Law Journal 15 (1). [Comparative institutional literature used for broader accountability analysis.]

Konov, Alexey, and Natalia Gorbacheva. 2025. “Inattention to Reality: Fighting Corruption in Russian Public Procurement with Pro-Competition Reforms.” Public Integrity 27 (6): 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2025.2469945.

Lyra, M. S., B. Damásio, F. L. Pinheiro, et al. 2022. “Fraud, Corruption, and Collusion in Public Procurement Activities: A Systematic Literature Review on Data-Driven Methods.” Applied Network Science 7: 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00523-6.

Maytandi, Andre, and Muhammad Hasyim Ibnu Abbas. 2020. “Does E-Procurement Prevent Corrupt Activity in Public Procurement Process?” Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis 8 (2): 143–153. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPEB.008.2.6.

Nurlukman, Adie Dwiyanto. 2017. “E-Procurement: Inovasi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Berbasis E-Government di Indonesia.” Journal of Government and Civil Society 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v1i1.264.

Nurmandi, Achmad. 2013. “The Status of Indonesia's E-Procurement.” Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2013.0020.

Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana, Achmad Hariri, Hilman Syahrial Haq, Adhy Riadhy Arafah, and Muallimin Mochammad Sahid. 2023. “Public Procurement Nexus Social for Mitigate the Corruption: Lesson from Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 7 (2): 413–448. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i2.72630.

Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana, Asis Asis, and Mualimin Mochammad Sahid. 2022. “Reduce Corruption in Public Procurement: The Effort Towards Good Governance.” BESTUUR 10 (1).

Purba, Rosinta H. F., and Amirullah S. Hardi. 2020. “Financial Performances and Public Procurement Loss: Indonesia Ministries/State Study.” Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v9i1.21.

Puspita, Anastasia Citra, and Yohanna Magdalena Lydia Gultom. 2024. “The Effect of E-Procurement Policy on Corruption in Government Procurement: Evidence from Indonesia.” International Journal of Public Administration 47 (2): 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2093900.

Shakira, Talitha Atha, and Irsyaf Marsal. 2025. “Subcontractors in Public Procurement: An Analysis of Potential Risks and Fraud Factors in Procurement Practices in Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Service and Research 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v6i1.1355.

Tonhäuser, Valeria, and Torill Stavenes. 2020. “Why Change Party Finance Transparency? Political Competition and Evidence from the ‘Deviant’ Case of Norway.” European Journal of Political Research. [Comparative transparency literature.]

Vaidya, Kishor, Ali Sajeev, and James Callender. 2006. “Critical Factors That Influence E-Procurement Implementation Success in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Procurement 6 (1–3): 70–99.

Wachs, Johannes, Mihály Fazekas, and János Kertész. 2021. “Corruption Risk in Contracting Markets: A Network Science Perspective.” International Journal of Data Science and Analytics 12: 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-019-00204-1.

Yanto, Deri, and Vid Adrison. 2020. “Do the Government Expenditure Audits Correlate with Corruption in Public Procurement?” Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v6i1.378.

Yu, Ann Tit Wan, Sitsofe Kwame Yevu, and Gabriel Nani. 2020. “Towards an Integration Framework for Promoting Electronic Procurement and Sustainable Procurement in the Construction Industry: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 250: 119493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119493.

Legal Sources

Republic of Indonesia. 1999. Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.

Republic of Indonesia. 2001. Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning the Amendment to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.

Republic of Indonesia. 2004. Law No. 1 of 2004 concerning State Treasury.

Republic of Indonesia. 2014. Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration.

Republic of Indonesia. 2018. Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services.

Republic of Indonesia. 2021. Presidential Regulation No. 12 of 2021 concerning the Amendment to Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services.

Republic of Indonesia. 2025. Presidential Regulation No. 46 of 2025 concerning the Second Amendment to Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 concerning Government Procurement of Goods/Services.

Government Procurement Policy Agency of the Republic of Indonesia. 2021. LKPP Regulation No. 12 of 2021 concerning Guidelines for Government Procurement through Providers.

Government Procurement Policy Agency of the Republic of Indonesia. 2024. LKPP Regulation No. 4 of 2024 concerning the Amendment to LKPP Regulation No. 12 of 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Corruption Risks in Indonesian Local Government Procurement: Evaluating Digital Procurement as an Anti-Corruption Instrument. (2026). Indonesian Anti Corruption Studies, 3(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.65815/1exfrs04