Restorative Justice as a Legal Intervention: A Model for Community-Based Conflict Resolution

Abstract

Introduction: Restorative justice, which focuses on repairing harm caused by crime or conflict through dialogue and mutual agreement, is gaining traction as a community-based legal intervention in Indonesia. Unlike traditional punitive measures, restorative justice emphasizes healing for both the victim and the offender.
Purpose: This paper investigates the application of restorative justice within community settings in Indonesia, analyzing how it serves as an alternative approach to conventional legal responses for resolving local disputes and promoting reconciliation.
Method: The study includes case studies of restorative justice programs in Indonesian communities, focusing on their process, outcomes, and challenges. Interviews with participants in these programs, as well as legal professionals and community leaders, provide insights into the effectiveness of restorative justice.
Findings and Results: The findings suggest that restorative justice programs have had positive outcomes in resolving conflicts, particularly in cases involving juvenile offenders or minor offenses. These programs encourage community involvement and promote reconciliation, although challenges such as societal acceptance and implementation inconsistencies remain.
Urgency: Given the increasing rates of petty crime and social unrest in Indonesia, restorative justice offers an urgent and viable alternative to punitive measures that may not always address the root causes of conflict.
Contribution: This paper highlights the potential of restorative justice as a tool for building community resilience and fostering reconciliation at the local level.
Recommendation: The study recommends the expansion of restorative justice programs, particularly in schools and rural communities, along with training for local leaders and legal professionals to ensure successful implementation.