Climate Change and Traditional Knowledge: Indigenous Adaptation Strategies in Papua and Their Legal Implications

Authors

  • Muhamamd Amrulllah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong Author
  • Muzakki Akbar Universitas Padjadjaran Author
  • Jabulani Nkosi Nelson Mandela University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65815/qke09z81

Keywords:

Climate Change, Traditional Knowledge, Indigenous People, Papua, Traditional Adaptation

Abstract

This research investigates the role of traditional knowledge in indigenous adaptation strategies to climate change in Papua, Indonesia, and explores the legal implications of recognizing and integrating these practices within national and international climate policy frameworks. Indigenous Papuans have developed unique, place-based knowledge systems to manage their environments and adapt to climate variability, including shifting weather patterns, changing agricultural cycles, and rising sea levels. This study examines how these traditional adaptation practices—ranging from sustainable farming techniques to water management systems—have helped communities cope with the impacts of climate change. Using qualitative research methods, including interviews with indigenous leaders, community members, and environmental activists, the research also critically assesses the extent to which these traditional knowledge systems are acknowledged and supported by the Indonesian legal system. The findings highlight a significant gap between the cultural value of indigenous knowledge and its legal recognition, particularly in the context of land rights, conservation practices, and climate adaptation policies. While Indonesia’s national climate policies increasingly emphasize participatory approaches, indigenous communities in Papua often face legal and institutional barriers that prevent them from fully utilizing their traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation. The study argues that incorporating indigenous knowledge into legal frameworks can enhance climate resilience while ensuring that indigenous rights are respected. The research concludes with policy recommendations aimed at strengthening legal protections for indigenous knowledge and promoting its integration into national climate strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x

Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006

Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., & Tompkins, E. L. (2005). Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005

Aldrich, D. P. (2012). Building resilience: Social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press.

Altieri, M. A., Nicholls, C. I., Henao, A., & Lana, M. A. (2015). Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming systems. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35, 869–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0285-2

Arizona, Y., Wicaksono, M. T., & Vel, J. A. C. (2019). The role of indigenous peoples in forest governance in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 108, 101940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101940

Banakar, R., & Travers, M. (2005). Theory and method in socio-legal research. Hart Publishing.

Bavikatte, K., & Robinson, D. F. (2011). Towards a peoples’ history of the law: Biocultural jurisprudence and the Nagoya Protocol on access and benefit sharing. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 7(1), 35–51.

Berkes, F. (2018). Sacred ecology (4th ed.). Routledge.

Boissière, M., Sheil, D., Basuki, I., Wan, M., & Le, H. T. (2013). Can engaging local people’s knowledge and aspirations improve REDD+? Lessons from Indonesia. Environmental Science & Policy, 35, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.03.002

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(3), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755797

Cinner, J. E., Adger, W. N., Allison, E. H., Barnes, M. L., Brown, K., Cohen, P. J., Gelcich, S., Hicks, C. C., Hughes, T. P., Lau, J., Marshall, N. A., & Morrison, T. H. (2018). Building adaptive capacity to climate change in tropical coastal communities. Nature Climate Change, 8, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0065-x

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ens, E. J., Pert, P., Clarke, P. A., Budden, M., Clubb, L., Doran, B., Douras, C., Gaikwad, J., Gott, B., Leonard, S., Locke, J., Packer, J., Turpin, G., & Wason, S. (2015). Indigenous biocultural knowledge in ecosystem science and management. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 22(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2015.1021948

Fa, J. E., Watson, J. E. M., Leiper, I., Potapov, P., Evans, T. D., Burgess, N. D., Molnár, Z., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Duncan, T., Wang, S., Austin, B. J., Jonas, H., Robinson, C. J., Malmer, P., Zander, K. K., Jackson, M. V., Ellis, E., Brondizio, E. S., & Garnett, S. T. (2020). Importance of Indigenous Peoples’ lands for the conservation of intact forest landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18(3), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2148

Fisher, M. R., Workman, T., Mulyana, A., Moeliono, M., & Wollenberg, E. (2018). Gendered landscapes and forest governance in Indonesia. World Development, 108, 1–12.

Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002

Ford, J. D., Cameron, L., Rubis, J., Maillet, M., Nakashima, D., Willox, A. C., & Pearce, T. (2016). Including Indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports. Nature Climate Change, 6, 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2954

Ford, J. D., King, N., Galappaththi, E. K., Pearce, T., McDowell, G., & Harper, S. L. (2020). The resilience of Indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth, 2(6), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.014

Garnett, S. T., Burgess, N. D., Fa, J. E., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Molnár, Z., Robinson, C. J., Watson, J. E. M., Zander, K. K., Austin, B., Brondizio, E. S., Collier, N. F., Duncan, T., Ellis, E., Geyle, H., Jackson, M. V., Jonas, H., Malmer, P., McGowan, B., Sivongxay, A., & Leiper, I. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1, 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6

Griffiths, J. (1986). What is legal pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 18(24), 1–55.

Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Hildingsson, R., & O’Riordan, T. (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge University Press.

Latulippe, N., & Klenk, N. (2020). Making room and moving over: Knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decision-making. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.010

Mercer, J., Kelman, I., Taranis, L., & Suchet-Pearson, S. (2012). Framework for integrating Indigenous and scientific knowledge for disaster risk reduction. Disasters, 36(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2011.01252.x

O’Brien, K. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 667–676.

Reyes-García, V., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., McElwee, P., Molnár, Z., Öllerer, K., Wilson, S. J., & Brondizio, E. S. (2019). The contributions of Indigenous peoples and local communities to ecological restoration. Restoration Ecology, 27(1), 3–8.

Robinson, C. J., Maclean, K., Hill, R., Bock, E., & Rist, P. (2021). Participatory Indigenous mapping for climate adaptation. Climate Policy, 21(6), 1–15.

Schlosberg, D. (2012). Climate justice and capabilities: A framework for adaptation policy. Ethics & International Affairs, 26(4), 445–461.

Siscawati, M., Banjade, M. R., Liswanti, N., Herawati, T., Mwangi, E., Wulandari, C., Tjoa, M., & Silaya, T. (2017). Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

Sultana, F. (2022). Critical climate justice. The Geographical Journal, 188(1), 118–124.

Tauli-Corpuz, V., Alcorn, J., Molnar, A., Healy, C., & Barrow, E. (2018). Cornered by protected areas: Replacing “fortress” conservation with rights-based approaches. Policy Matters, 21, 1–15.

Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., Elmqvist, T., & Folke, C. (2017). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.004

von Benda-Beckmann, F., & von Benda-Beckmann, K. (2006). The dynamics of customary law in Indonesia. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 38(53), 1–20.

Whyte, K. P. (2013). Justice forward: Tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility. Climatic Change, 120, 517–530.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Climate Change and Traditional Knowledge: Indigenous Adaptation Strategies in Papua and Their Legal Implications. (2025). Indonesian Climate Justice Review, 2(4), 463-508. https://doi.org/10.65815/qke09z81